Welcome to NDT Inspect's NDT and inspection codes and standards group, a place for professionals to connect and discuss the latest developments and best practices in the field of NDT and inspection codes and standards. The development and use of codes and standards is an essential aspect of ensuring the safety, quality, and reliability of products, materials, and structures in various industries.
In the field of NDT and inspection, codes and standards provide guidance on the appropriate methods, procedures, and practices to be followed when conducting non-destructive testing and inspection activities. These codes and standards may be developed by national and international standardization organizations, regulatory bodies, or industry associations, and they may be mandatory or voluntary in nature.
Our member group offers a platform for sharing knowledge and best practices on NDT and inspection codes and standards and their applications in various industries. Join our community of experts from around the world and be a part of the conversation on advancing the practice of NDT and inspection in accordance with the latest codes and standards. Whether you are new to NDT and inspection or an experienced professional, you'll find valuable resources and a welcoming community in our group.
Updates
-
terri replied to a discussion1 year ago
Thank you for the response. Unfortunately, the fabrication shop and the subcontractor has knowingly falsified reader sheets in order to push acceptance of pressure vessels.
-
kevinmendoza1 replied to a discussion1 year ago
Terri,
ASME BPVC.V Article 2 Section T-290 will detail the requirements.
T-290 DOCUMENTATION
T-291 RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUE
DOCUMENTATION DETAILS
The organization shall prepare and document the
radiographic technique details. As a minimum, the following
information shall be provided.
(a) the requirements of Article 1, T-190(a)
(b) identification as required by T-224
(c) the dimensional map (if used) of marker placement
in accordance with T-275.3
(d) number of exposures
(e) X-ray voltage or isotope type used
(f) source size (F in T-274.1)
(g) base material type and thickness, weld thickness,
weld reinforcement thickness, as applicable
(h) source-to-object distance (D in T-274.1)
(i) distance from source side of object to film (d in
T-274.1)
(j) film manufacturer and their assigned type/
designation
(k) number of film in each film holder/cassette
(l) single- or double-wall exposure
(m) single- or double-wall viewing
T-292 RADIOGRAPH REVIEW FORM
The Manufacturer shall be responsible for the preparation
of a radiograph review form. As a minimum, the following
information shall be provided.
(a) a listing of each radiograph location
(b) the information required in T-291, by inclusion of
the information on the review form or by reference to
an attached radiographic technique details sheet
(c) evaluation and disposition of the material(s) or
weld(s) examined
(d) identification (name) of the Manufacturer’s representative
who performed the final acceptance of the
radiographs
(e) date of Manufacturer’s evaluation
Hope this helps.
-
rafa started the discussion WPS T joint CJP according AWS D1.11 year ago
Hi,
I have question regarding the WPS document. I have T joint which consists of 16 mm main chord with 60 mm flanges with CPJ. Please advise what is the proper WPS document should be? is it 16 mm WPS is suitable according to AWS D1.1 (?) thanks for your assistance.
-
terri started the discussion Film requirements for pressure vessels2 years ago
Can anyone refer me to the requirements of radiographs? Specifically, what information 'shall' be on each view and what ASME section drives that information? Thank you!
-
Pls send acceptance criteria
👍1 -
ASME B31.1 acceptance criteria<div>
</div>👍1 -
Kenton started the discussion The Importance of Impartial and Objective Evaluation in Non-Destructive Testing in the forum Codes and Standards3 years agoNon-Destructive Testing (NDT) is a crucial aspect of the manufacturing process, as it helps to ensure that parts and structures meet required standards. In many industries, third-party NDT inspection is mandatory to guarantee impartial and objective evaluation of the parts and structures. However, some companies attempt to circumvent third-party inspection by setting up their own NDT laboratory and conducting the inspections in-house.
While this approach may seem more convenient and cost-effective, it raises serious concerns about the impartiality and objectivity of the inspection results. The integrity of the NDT process is dependent on the use of independent, third-party inspectors who are not affiliated with the company manufacturing the parts or structures. By doing so, companies can ensure that the parts and structures are evaluated objectively, without any conflicts of interest.
Companies should not take shortcuts when it comes to NDT inspection. While it may be tempting to conduct the inspection in-house, it is important to remember that impartial and objective evaluation is crucial for the success of the NDT process. Companies that invest in independent, third-party NDT inspection can be confident that their parts and structures meet required standards, ensuring the quality and safety of their products.
To prevent companies from evading third-party NDT inspection, the following steps can be taken:
Implement regulations and standards: Governments and industry organizations can establish regulations and standards that require third-party NDT inspection for all parts and structures. These regulations should be strictly enforced to ensure that companies comply with the requirements.
Promote the importance of impartial evaluation: Companies can be educated about the importance of impartial evaluation in the NDT process. This can help to raise awareness about the dangers of in-house NDT inspection and encourage companies to invest in independent, third-party inspection.
Enhance the accreditation process: The accreditation process for NDT inspection companies can be enhanced to ensure that only reputable and qualified organizations are authorized to conduct NDT inspections. This will help to reduce the number of companies that are not equipped to provide impartial and objective evaluation.
Encourage transparency: Companies that conduct NDT inspection should be encouraged to be transparent about their methods and results. This will help to promote confidence in the NDT process and increase the credibility of the results.
Foster collaboration: Governments, industry organizations, and NDT inspection companies can work together to promote the importance of impartial and objective evaluation in the NDT process. This can help to raise awareness about the dangers of in-house NDT inspection and encourage companies to invest in independent, third-party inspection.
Has any member come across instances where companies have attempted to evade third-party NDT inspection and conduct the inspections in-house? If so, how frequent is this issue in the industry?
-
NDT-Inspect posted an update in the group Codes and Standards3 years agoNDT Standards: A Guide to the Organizations and Regulations Governing NDTThere are several organizations that develop and publish standards for NDT, including the American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT), the British Society for Non-Destructive Testing (BSNDT), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). These standards provide guidelines for the training, certification, and performance of NDT personnel, as well as the proper use and interpretation of NDT techniques.
/ndt-standards-a-guide-to-the-organizations-and-regulations-governing-ndt/
-
NDT-Inspect posted an update in the group Codes and Standards3 years agoStandards Australia is the national standards body of Australia and is responsible for developing and publishing technical standards in a variety of industries, including non-destructive testing (NDT). Here is a list of some of the Australian standards that are relevant to NDT:
- AS/NZS ISO 9712: Non-destructive testing - Qualification and certification of NDT personnel
- AS 2768.2: Part 2: Guide to the inspection of pressure equipment
- AS 3788: Guide to the magnetic particle inspection of ferromagnetic materials
- AS 4792: Guide to the ultrasonic testing of welds
- AS 3978: Guide to the radiographic inspection of welds
- AS 4534: Guide to the use of fluorescent penetrant inspection
- AS 4798: Guide to the inspection of pressure vessels using ultrasonic testing
- AS 4793: Guide to the ultrasonic testing of welds in castings
- AS 4037: Guide to the use of eddy current inspection methods
- AS 4796: Guide to the ultrasonic inspection of fusion welded pressure vessels
These standards provide guidance on the qualification and certification of NDT personnel, as well as the application and interpretation of various NDT methods, including ultrasonic, magnetic particle, radiographic, penetrant, and eddy current testing. They also provide guidance on the inspection of pressure equipment, such as pressure vessels, using various NDT methods.
-
NDT-Inspect posted an update in the group Codes and Standards3 years agoThe European Committee for Standardization (CEN) is the European organization responsible for developing and publishing technical standards. Here is a list of some of the EN (European Standard) codes and standards that are relevant to non-destructive testing (NDT):
- EN 473: Non-destructive testing - Qualification and certification of NDT personnel
- EN 583-1: Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing - Part 1: General principles
- EN 583-2: Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing - Part 2: Pulse-echo technique
- EN 583-3: Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing - Part 3: Time-of-flight diffraction technique
- EN 583-4: Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing - Part 4: Techniques using through-transmission
- EN 583-5: Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing - Part 5: Pulse-echo technique using phased arrays
- EN 583-6: Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing - Part 6: Time-of-flight diffraction technique using phased arrays
- EN 583-7: Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing - Part 7: Guided wave testing
- EN 584: Non-destructive testing - Leak testing
- EN 588: Non-destructive testing - Liquid penetrant testing
- EN 589: Non-destructive testing - Magnetic particle testing
- EN 591: Non-destructive testing - Radiographic testing
- EN 592: Non-destructive testing - Eddy current testing
- EN 593: Non-destructive testing - Acoustic emission testing
These codes and standards provide guidance on the qualification, certification, and performance of NDT personnel, as well as the application and interpretation of various NDT methods, including ultrasonic, leak, penetrant, magnetic particle, radiographic, eddy current, and acoustic emission testing.
-
NDT-Inspect posted an update in the group Codes and Standards3 years agoThe American Petroleum Institute (API) has a number of codes and standards that relate to non-destructive testing (NDT) for the oil and gas industry. Here is a list of some of the API codes and standards that are relevant to NDT:
- API RP 581: Risk-Based Inspection Technology
- API RP 583: Corrosion Under Insulation and Fireproofing
- API RP 586: Guide to Inspection of Exchangers
- API RP 591: Process Valve Qualification Procedures
- API RP 594: Check Valves: Inspection and Maintenance
- API RP 599: Metal Plug Valves - Flanged, Lug, Wafer, and Butt-Welding
- API RP 651: Cathodic Protection of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks
- API RP 652: Lining of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Bottoms
- API RP 653: Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction
- API RP 686: Machinery Installation and Installation Design
- API RP 7G-2: Inspection of New Casing, Tubing, and Plain-end Drill Pipe
- API RP 7G-3: Inspection of Used Drill Stem Elements
- API RP 7G-4: Field Inspection of New Rotating Equipment
- API RP 7G-5: Inspection of New Rotating Equipment Utilizing Radiographic Techniques
These codes and standards provide guidance on the inspection, maintenance, and repair of various types of equipment and components used in the oil and gas industry, including exchangers, valves, tanks, and rotating equipment. They also provide guidance on corrosion protection and the qualification of NDT personnel using various NDT methods, such as radiographic testing.
👍1 -
NDT-Inspect posted an update in the group Codes and Standards3 years agoASME (the American Society of Mechanical Engineers) has a number of codes and standards that relate to non-destructive testing (NDT). Here is a list of some of the ASME codes and standards that are relevant to NDT:
- ASME B31.3: Process Piping
- ASME B31.4: Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids
- ASME B31.8: Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems
- ASME BPVC (Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code) Section V: Nondestructive Examination
- ASME BPVC Section IX: Welding and Brazing Qualifications
- ASME BPVC Section XI: Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components
- ASME BPVC Section XV: Rules for Construction and Inservice Inspection of Transport Tank
- ASME NQA-1: Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications
- ASME N510: Standard for Qualification of Radiographic Personnel
- ASME N513: Standard for Qualification of Ultrasonic Testing Personnel
- ASME N514: Standard for Qualification of Magnetic Particle Testing Personnel
- ASME N516: Standard for Qualification of Liquid Penetrant Testing Personnel
- ASME N523: Standard for Qualification of Eddy Current Testing Personnel
- ASME N524: Standard for Qualification of Acoustic Emission Testing Personnel
- ASME N525: Standard for Qualification of Infrared and Thermal Testing Personnel
- ASME N526: Standard for Qualification of Visual Testing Personnel
- ASME N527: Standard for Qualification of Leak Testing Personnel
- ASME N541: Standard for Qualification of Testing Agencies and Personnel for the Qualification of Welding Procedures, Welders, and Welding Operators
- ASME N542: Standard for Qualification of Testing Agencies and Personnel for the Qualification of Welding Procedures, Welders, and Welding Operators for Use in the Construction of Pressure Vessels
- ASME NQA-2: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Facility Applications
- ASME NQA-3: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Components
- ASME NQA-4: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Materials
- ASME NQA-5: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Valves
- ASME NQA-6: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Piping
- ASME NQA-7: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Electrical and Electronic Components
- ASME NQA-8: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems
- ASME NQA-9: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Rotating Equipment
- ASME NQA-10: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Systems, and Components
- ASME NQA-11: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Non-Structural Components
- ASME NQA-12: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Civil Structures
- ASME NQA-13: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Fire Protection Systems
- ASME NQA-14: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Concrete Structures
- ASME NQA-15: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Concrete Reinforcing Steel
- ASME NQA-16: Standard for Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Post-Construction Materials
-
NDT-Inspect started the discussion API, methods for calculating remaining life of equipment in the forum Codes and Standards3 years agoAPI (American Petroleum Institute) is a trade organization that develops standards for the oil and gas industry. API has developed several methods for calculating the remaining life of equipment and structures in the oil and gas industry, including methods for calculating the remaining life due to corrosion.
One such method is the API RP 571: Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry. This guideline provides a framework for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating damage mechanisms, including corrosion, that can affect fixed equipment in the refining industry.
To calculate the remaining life of equipment due to corrosion using the API RP 571 method, the following steps should be followed:
Identify the type of corrosion that is occurring: This includes identifying the type of corrosion (such as uniform corrosion, pitting corrosion, or crevice corrosion) and the specific corrosion mechanism that is at play (such as galvanic corrosion or corrosion caused by stress).
Determine the corrosion rate: This involves measuring the thickness loss of the material over a specific period of time, typically in millimeters per year (mm/year). The corrosion rate can be determined through various methods, including corrosion coupons, electrochemical techniques, or corrosion probes.
Determine the remaining life: Once the corrosion rate has been determined, you can use it to calculate the remaining life of the equipment. This can be done by dividing the remaining thickness of the material by the corrosion rate. For example, if the remaining thickness of a material is 5 mm and the corrosion rate is 0.5 mm/year, the remaining life of the structure would be 10 years.
It is important to note that these calculations are estimates and the actual remaining life of the equipment may be longer or shorter depending on various factors. It is also important to regularly monitor the equipment to ensure that it is safe and in good condition.
-
ASME is a professional organization that develops codes and standards for the design, construction, and inspection of boilers and other pressure vessels. One of the ASME standards that pertains to boiler inspection is the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC).
The BPVC includes several sections that address the inspection of boilers and other pressure vessels, including:
Section I: This section covers the rules for the construction of power boilers, which are boilers that generate steam for the purpose of power generation or for use in a processing application.
Section IV: This section covers the rules for the construction of heating boilers, which are boilers that generate steam or hot water for heating or other non-power generation purposes.
Section VIII: This section covers the rules for the construction of pressure vessels, which are containers designed to hold gases or liquids at high pressure.
The BPVC specifies the requirements for the design, materials, fabrication, and inspection of boilers and pressure vessels. It includes guidelines for the use of various NDT methods, such as radiographic testing, ultrasonic testing, and magnetic particle testing, to detect defects or imperfections in these components.
The BPVC also includes requirements for the periodic inspection of boilers and pressure vessels. These inspections are typically required at regular intervals in order to ensure the safety and reliability of these components. The specific inspection requirements will depend on the type of boiler or pressure vessel, its age and condition, and the potential consequences of failure.
Adherence to the ASME BPVC is important for the safe operation of boilers and pressure vessels. It helps to ensure that these components are designed, constructed, and inspected to a consistent and high standard, which helps to reduce the risk of accidents or failures.
-
The Australian non-destructive testing (NDT) standard, AS/NZS ISO 9712, is a standard that specifies the requirements for the qualification and certification of personnel who perform NDT. The standard is based on the international standard ISO 9712 and is applicable to a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, construction, and aviation.
The standard covers the qualification and certification of personnel who perform NDT in four levels:
Level 1: This is the basic level of NDT certification, which is suitable for personnel who perform simple NDT tasks under the supervision of a Level 2 or Level 3 personnel.
Level 2: This is the intermediate level of NDT certification, which is suitable for personnel who can perform NDT independently and supervise Level 1 personnel.
Level 3: This is the advanced level of NDT certification, which is suitable for personnel who can perform NDT independently and supervise Level 1 and Level 2 personnel.
Level 4: This is the highest level of NDT certification, which is suitable for personnel who have a broad and in-depth knowledge of NDT and can act as technical experts or consultants.
AS/NZS ISO 9712 specifies the minimum requirements for the training and experience of personnel who wish to obtain NDT certification at each level. It also includes requirements for the periodic recertification of personnel and the use of appropriate NDT methods and equipment.
The use of certified personnel is important in the NDT industry, as it helps to ensure that NDT inspections are carried out to a consistent and high standard. Adherence to the Australian NDT standard helps to ensure the safety and reliability of the components and structures being inspected.








