table 7.9 of ASME VIII Div.2

  • table 7.9 of ASME VIII Div.2

    Posted by davide-gesuato on 12/02/2023 at 1:47 pm

    I’m having a discussion about the acceptability of indications by applying table 7.9 of ASME VIII Div.2.
    There are two different opinions. It is not clear whether, in the event that a subsurface defect has a height lower than the value in the table and a length greater than 6.4 mm, the imperfection is acceptable or not.
    In my opinion, to be unacceptable, both the height (a/t) and the length must exceed the values in the table and if it exceeds only the length, the limit is 4t.
    Thanks to anyone who can help me.

    kenton replied 2 years, 1 month ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • 1 Reply
  • Phased Array Ultrasonics (PAUT)

    kenton

    Member
    12/02/2023 at 2:04 pm

    Hi,

    I have found this:

    you determine both your a/l and your a/t for a given thickness. This will likely require linear interpolation(s). You then compare your a/t% to your a/l for that thickness. If your a/t% falls below the allowable a/t% for that thickness, the flaw is allowable.

    General formula for interpolation:

    http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpinterpolation/linear_interpolation_equation.php

    Hope it helps.

Log in to reply.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.