Remote field transition and probe spacing

Remote field testing exists because conventional eddy currents cannot get through a ferromagnetic tube wall. A relative permeability of a hundred divides the standard depth of penetration by ten, so a bobbin coil in a carbon steel tube sees essentially only the inside surface. Remote field testing sidesteps the problem by not trying to read the field that stayed inside the tube at all.

Two fields leave the exciter. The direct field travels along the bore and is attenuated very rapidly by the tube wall acting as a shield. The indirect field passes outward through the wall, travels along the outside of the tube where attenuation is low, and re-enters through the wall further along. The direct field falls off far faster with axial distance, so beyond roughly two tube diameters the indirect field dominates. That region is the remote field zone; the span around 1.5 to 2 diameters where the two are comparable is the transition zone, where they interfere and the phase is unstable. Detector coils are therefore placed two to three tube diameters from the exciter, and never in the transition zone.

Because the energy crosses the wall twice, the phase lag is about double the one-way wall lag, roughly 2 x 57.3 x t / delta degrees, and the amplitude loss is doubled too. This double transit is what gives remote field testing its defining property: approximately equal sensitivity to inside and outside surface flaws, since both lie in the same through-transmission path. It is also why the technique is slow and low frequency - tens to a few hundred hertz - and why signals are 30 dB or more below what a conventional bobbin would give on non-ferrous tube.

Use this when laying out or checking a remote field probe, when a procedure specifies a spacing you want to verify against the tube size, and when deciding a test frequency: too high and the double-transit attenuation buries the signal, too low and the phase lag becomes too small to resolve depth.

remote field zone begins at about 2 x tube outside diameter from the exciter
exciter-to-detector spacing L = k x OD, with k typically 2 to 3
delta = 1 / sqrt(pi f mu0 mur sigma)
double-transit phase lag = 2 x 57.3 x t / delta  degrees
double-transit loss = 20 x log10( e^(2t/delta) )  dB

Members-only calculator

Sign in or join free to use the full NDT toolbox.

Sign in View memberships

Notes:
  • Never place a detector in the transition zone, roughly 1.5 to 2 diameters from the exciter - the direct and indirect fields interfere there and phase readings are unstable.
  • Remote field gives roughly equal sensitivity to ID and OD flaws because both lie in the same through-transmission path. That is its main advantage over conventional bobbin testing of ferrous tube.
  • Signals are 30 dB or more below conventional bobbin levels, so scanning is slow and electrical noise control matters.
  • Relative permeability of carbon steel is not a fixed property. The calculated skin depth, phase lag and attenuation are estimates - the calibration standard, in the same material and condition, is what governs.
  • Support plates, tubesheets and baffles produce large signals in remote field testing; their locations must be established before flaw calls are made.

Reference: ASTM E2096 - Standard Practice for In Situ Examination of Ferromagnetic Heat-Exchanger Tubes Using Remote Field Testing; ASNT Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 3rd Edition, Volume 5: Electromagnetic Testing

These calculators support — never replace — calculations against the governing code edition and your written procedure. Verify results independently before use.

Related calculators

193 calculations with worked examples

NDT calculators

All calculators

955 discussions · 382 answers

Latest forum discussions

Open the forum
Petrochemical plant with distillation columns

Join free

Join 5,341 NDT professionals for free

Groups, forum, resume upload, vacancy alerts and the member directory — no charge.

Sponsors of NDT Inspect
Magnaflux
Sponsor slot open