Emissivity and reflected temperature correction

An infrared camera measures radiance, not temperature. The radiance reaching the detector is a mixture of three things: radiation emitted by the target, scaled by its emissivity ε; radiation from the surroundings reflected off the target, scaled by (1−ε); and radiation emitted by the air in between, which also attenuates the first two by the transmission τ. The camera converts the total into a temperature, so unless the correct ε, reflected apparent temperature and transmission are entered, the number on the screen is not the surface temperature.

Working in the broadband approximation where radiance goes as the fourth power of absolute temperature, the measurement equation rearranges to T_obj = [(T_meas⁴ − (1−ε)·τ·T_refl⁴ − (1−τ)·T_atm⁴)/(ε·τ)]^(1/4), with every temperature in kelvin. All three corrections push in the same direction on a hot target in cool surroundings: the reading understates the true temperature, and the lower the emissivity the worse it gets. Where the view passes through an infrared window or protective optic — routine on energised switchgear — the window's transmission τ_win multiplies everything behind it and the window adds its own emission, so the same rearrangement carries a τ_win divisor and a (1−τ_win)·T_win⁴ term.

Reflected apparent temperature is the parameter most often left at ambient by default and most often wrong. It is not the air temperature — it is the effective temperature of everything radiating onto the target, which near a furnace, a flare or a sunlit sky can be hundreds of degrees away from ambient. Measure it with the crumpled-aluminium-foil reflector method, or by reading a diffuse reflector placed at the target and pointing away from the object.

Emissivity itself is a property of the surface, not the material: polished aluminium sits near 0.05 while the same alloy oxidised is 0.25, and paint, rust or a scale layer takes carbon steel to 0.9. It also varies with viewing angle, wavelength band and temperature. Because the correction divides by ε, low-emissivity surfaces amplify every error — which is why the sensitivity figure matters: it shows how many degrees the answer moves for a 0.05 change in the emissivity assumed. Where that number is large, apply a high-emissivity tape or paint patch and measure the surface temperature there instead of arguing about the value.

T_obj = [ (T_meas⁴ − τw·(1−ε)·τ·T_refl⁴ − τw·(1−τ)·T_atm⁴ − (1−τw)·T_win⁴) / (ε·τ·τw) ]^0.25
all temperatures in kelvin: K = °C + 273.15
no window, short path (τw = τ = 1):  T_obj = [ (T_meas⁴ − (1−ε)·T_refl⁴) / ε ]^0.25

Members-only calculator

Sign in or join free to use the full NDT toolbox.

Sign in View memberships

Notes:
  • Set the camera emissivity to 1 to read the apparent temperature, then correct — or enter the parameters into the camera and let it do the same arithmetic.
  • Reflected apparent temperature is not ambient air temperature. Measure it with a crumpled aluminium foil reflector at the target position.
  • Emissivity depends on surface condition, viewing angle and waveband. Table values are typical for 8-14 µm at near-normal incidence.
  • Below about 0.5 emissivity the correction amplifies every error — apply high-emissivity tape or paint and measure there instead.
  • Never take a reading of a shiny surface at an angle where the camera or the operator can be seen reflected in it.
  • The fourth-power form is the broadband approximation. Narrow-band and very high temperature work needs the camera's own radiance calibration.
  • Measuring through an IR window: take the transmission from the window's calibration certificate (or establish it against a known target) and enter the window surface temperature. The window's own emission is modelled as (1−τ_win) at that temperature; window reflection is neglected.

Reference: ISO 18434-1:2008 (condition monitoring — thermography) measurement equation; emissivity values are typical published figures for the 8-14 µm band and must be verified on the actual surface.

These calculators support — never replace — calculations against the governing code edition and your written procedure. Verify results independently before use.

Related calculators

193 calculations with worked examples

NDT calculators

All calculators

955 discussions · 382 answers

Latest forum discussions

Open the forum
Petrochemical plant with distillation columns

Join free

Join 5,341 NDT professionals for free

Groups, forum, resume upload, vacancy alerts and the member directory — no charge.

Sponsors of NDT Inspect
Magnaflux
Sponsor slot open