Reference reflector equivalence: FBH, SDH and notch

Wave mode: both

Codes and procedures do not agree on a reference reflector. ASME leans on side-drilled holes, DGS and much of the aerospace world on flat-bottomed holes, and surface-breaking acceptance work on machined notches. Sensitivity set on one of them is not the same sensitivity on another, and the gap can be more than 10 dB.

All three can be placed on one scale by asking what each returns relative to a plane back wall at the same range, in the far field. A small disc such as a flat-bottomed hole re-radiates as a piston of its own area, giving π d²/(2 λ z). A side-drilled hole is a convex cylinder: it reflects specularly with a √(a/2z) amplitude factor and spreads cylindrically, which works out as √(D/z) relative to the back wall — the familiar 9 dB per doubling instead of 12. A machined notch presented squarely to the beam behaves as a flat strip of area h × ℓ, with a corner-trap coefficient that depends on how nearly the beam bisects the corner.

Two consequences are worth remembering. The side-drilled hole response contains no wavelength term, so an SDH-referenced sensitivity does not scale with probe frequency the way an FBH-referenced one does — the same hole is a different number of decibels below a disc at 2 MHz and at 5 MHz. And because the SDH decays more slowly with range, an SDH-based DAC and an FBH-based curve diverge steadily with sound path.

These are far-field geometric-acoustic models: they assume the reflector is fully inside the beam, squarely presented, much larger than a wavelength for the cylinder and notch, and small compared with the beam for the disc. They are for understanding and cross-checking sensitivity, not for substituting one reflector type for another in a code that names one — that substitution has to be qualified by measurement on a real block.

λ = c / f
flat-bottomed hole:  V/V_bw = π d² / (2 λ z)
side-drilled hole:   V/V_bw = √( D / z )        (no wavelength term)
notch as flat strip: V/V_bw = 2 R_c h ℓ / (λ z)
equivalent disc diameter:  d = √( 2 λ z · (V/V_bw) / π )
so SDH → FBH:  d² = (2 λ / π) √(D z)

Members-only calculator

Sign in or join free to use the full NDT toolbox.

Sign in View memberships

Notes:
  • Far-field geometric model. The disc must be small compared with the beam, the hole and notch large compared with a wavelength and squarely presented.
  • Do not substitute one reflector type for another where a code names a specific one — qualify the substitution on a real block first.
  • The side-drilled hole result carries no wavelength term, so the FBH–SDH difference changes with probe frequency.
  • Notch response is very sensitive to the beam-to-corner angle; the corner coefficient is 1.0 only for an ideal bisected 90° corner.

Reference: Krautkramer, Ultrasonic Testing of Materials — far-field responses of disc, cylindrical and plane reflectors; reference blocks per ASTM E127 (FBH), ASME BPVC Section V Article 4 (SDH), ASTM E164

These calculators support — never replace — calculations against the governing code edition and your written procedure. Verify results independently before use.

Related calculators

193 calculations with worked examples

NDT calculators

All calculators

955 discussions · 382 answers

Latest forum discussions

Open the forum
Refinery lit up at dusk, reflected in water

Free tools

193 NDT calculators with worked examples

Beam geometry, near field, TOFD depth, source decay, penetrant dwell, leak rates and more.

Sponsors of NDT Inspect
Magnaflux
Sponsor slot open