ToFD flaw through-wall height

Wave mode: compression

A planar flaw that is not surface-breaking produces two diffracted signals: one from its upper tip and one from its lower tip. Each is converted to a depth with the standard ToFD relation d = sqrt((c*t/2)^2 - S^2), and the through-wall height is the difference between them. The lower tip arrives later and, for a crack-like flaw, is normally in phase opposition to the upper tip signal. That phase change is the main confirmation that the two arrivals belong to the same flaw rather than to two separate features.

Working from the two depths, rather than from the time difference alone, is essential because the time-to-depth relation is non-linear. The same time interval represents a much larger height near the scanning surface than it does near mid-wall, so any height obtained by simply scaling a time difference is only valid deep in the wall.

Through-wall height is the parameter that drives acceptance in ISO 15626 and in fitness-for-service assessment, so record the ligament to each surface as well as the height. If the upper tip signal merges into the lateral wave, the flaw is either surface-breaking or lies inside the near-surface dead zone; height must then be measured from the scanning surface or by a complementary technique, and reported as such.

Both signals must be taken from the same probe position, ideally at the apex of the flaw arc in the D-scan. Cursors placed on different scan positions mix in the off-axis error and overstate the height.

S = PCS / 2
d_upper = √( (c × (t_upper − t_delay) / 2)² − S² )
d_lower = √( (c × (t_lower − t_delay) / 2)² − S² )
h = d_lower − d_upper

Members-only calculator

Sign in or join free to use the full NDT toolbox.

Sign in View memberships

Notes:
  • Both cursors must be taken at the same probe position, at the apex of the flaw arc in the D-scan.
  • Confirm the phase relationship between the two tip signals before sizing. Two same-phase signals are usually two separate features, not one flaw.
  • If the upper tip merges with the lateral wave, treat the flaw as surface-breaking or as being in the near-surface dead zone and size it by a complementary technique.
  • Report height together with both ligaments; acceptance criteria and fitness-for-service assessments need all three.

Reference: ISO 10863:2011 §9 (evaluation and sizing); ISO 15626:2018 (TOFD acceptance levels); ASME BPVC Section V, Article 4, Mandatory Appendix III

These calculators support — never replace — calculations against the governing code edition and your written procedure. Verify results independently before use.

Related calculators

193 calculations with worked examples

NDT calculators

All calculators

955 discussions · 382 answers

Latest forum discussions

Open the forum
Refinery lit up at dusk, reflected in water

Free tools

193 NDT calculators with worked examples

Beam geometry, near field, TOFD depth, source decay, penetrant dwell, leak rates and more.

Sponsors of NDT Inspect
Magnaflux
Sponsor slot open