ToFD off-axis depth error

Wave mode: compression

The ToFD depth equation assumes the diffractor sits on the line midway between the two probes. A tip offset across the weld, or lying ahead of or behind the current probe position along the scan axis, has a longer total path than a tip at the same depth on the centreline, so it always reads deeper than it really is.

With the transmitter and receiver index points at plus and minus S, an offset x across the weld and y along the scan direction, the total path is sqrt((S+x)^2 + y^2 + d^2) + sqrt((S-x)^2 + y^2 + d^2). Feeding half of that into the standard depth relation gives the apparent depth. The error is always positive and grows quickly for shallow flaws and large offsets, for the same reason that shallow depths are sensitive to PCS error: the arrival-time curve is nearly flat near the surface.

The y term is why point-like reflectors draw hyperbolic arcs in a D-scan. As the probes approach and pass the reflector, y falls to zero and rises again, so the apparent depth drops to the true depth at the apex and rises on either side. Always take depth readings at the apex of the arc.

ToFD gives no transverse position information at all. A signal from a diffractor well off the weld centreline is indistinguishable from a deeper one on the centreline. Where transverse position matters, use offset scans, a complementary pulse-echo or phased-array scan, or move the ToFD pair across the weld and watch how the indication depth changes.

S = PCS / 2
L = √((S + x)² + y² + d²) + √((S − x)² + y² + d²)
d_apparent = √( (L / 2)² − S² )
error = d_apparent − d

Members-only calculator

Sign in or join free to use the full NDT toolbox.

Sign in View memberships

Notes:
  • The error is always positive: an off-centreline diffractor never reads shallower than it is.
  • Take depth readings at the apex of the flaw arc in the D-scan, where the along-scan offset is zero.
  • ToFD carries no transverse position information. Use offset scans or a complementary technique when across-weld position matters.
  • The same geometry explains the hyperbolic arcs drawn by point reflectors and the curved tails on the ends of planar flaws.

Reference: General engineering (ToFD path geometry for a diffractor off the probe centreline); ISO 10863:2011 §9 for evaluation and positioning requirements

These calculators support — never replace — calculations against the governing code edition and your written procedure. Verify results independently before use.

Related calculators

193 calculations with worked examples

NDT calculators

All calculators

955 discussions · 382 answers

Latest forum discussions

Open the forum
Refinery lit up at dusk, reflected in water

Free tools

193 NDT calculators with worked examples

Beam geometry, near field, TOFD depth, source decay, penetrant dwell, leak rates and more.

Sponsors of NDT Inspect
Magnaflux
Sponsor slot open